Legal Opinion

Orpheum Building Co. v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1978No. Civ. 38949PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

The owners, Orpheum Building Company (Orpheum) and their lessee, Northcoast Theatres Corporation (Northcoast), appeal from an adverse judgment after a bifurcated trial of their complaint against Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) alleging causes of action for inverse condemnation, nuisance, trespass and third party beneficiary. On the bifurcated cause of action for inverse condemnation, the jury found no damages and special benefits. As to inverse condemnation, Orpheum and Northcoast contend that: 1) they were deprived of a jury trial; 2) the court erroneously…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Price Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Friends of H Street v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Redevelopment Agency v. Contra Costa Theatre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API