Legal Opinion
Stone v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 1975No. Civ. 44385PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J.
On April 11, 1972, plaintiffs Stone filed their complaint and, after defendant City of Los Angeles (hereinafter “city”) successfully demurred to it, plaintiffs filed an “amended and supplemental complaint,” followed by another city demurrer which incorporated by reference (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.70) an attached copy of a complaint (L.A. superior court case No. C-37558) it had filed seeking condemnation of plaintiffs’ and other properties. Plaintiffs filed a second amended and supplemental complaint in two counts. City’s demurrer to count II of this complaint was sustained…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Phillips v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Buena Park School District v. Metrim Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Reichs Ford Road Joint Venture v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Tilem v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Andrews v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Marshall v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.