Legal Opinion

I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1954Published

1Opinion

On Beheaeing

*308Black & Kendall, of Portland, and McKeown S New-house, of Coos Bay, attorneys for respondent. TOOZE, J.

The plaintiff, I-L Logging Company has filed a petition for rehearing which, omitting formal parts, reads as follows:

‘ ‘ 1. The opinion herein is a complete and radical departure from and abandonment of the well-established rules of construction heretofore applied by this Court in the construction of insurance policies.

“2. The construction placed by the Court upon the ambiguous language of the insurance policy issued by respondent is prohibited by the statutes of this State.
“3.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Cox v. Kansas City Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API