Legal Opinion

Grimm v. Franklin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 26, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill seeks an injunction against the prosecution by the defendant of four suits at law against the several complainants, all of which suits are for the recovery of attorney's fees alleged to be due to the defendant from the complainants under the provisions of a certain contract of employment between the members of an association of independent jitney owners of whom complainants were a part, and the defendant. Immediately upon the filing of the bill an order to show cause with restraint was issued and on the return of that order the restraint thereby imposed was continued pendente lite…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Soper v. BilderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  2. Wilson v. SeeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  3. Brown v. BulkleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  4. Kelley v. SchwinghammerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  5. Porter v. BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics OfficersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Thomas Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Lewis v. MorganNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API