Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Schwinghammer

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 23, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On bill for injunction. Hearing at return of order to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, V. C.

Defendant is an attorney and counselor-at-law and solicitor in chancery, and is payee in a certain promissory note made by complainant. The note was given to defendant by complainant in settlement for legal services which defendant had performed for complainant as his client. An action at law has been brought by defendant against complainant to recover the amount of the note; that action is now pending. The present bill seeks to restrain further proceedings in the action at law and prays that an accounting may be had to determine the amount justly due from complainant to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maull v. StrokesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  2. Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Lewis v. MorganNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. Raimondi v. BianchiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API