Wilson v. Seeber
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show canse. Heard on bill and affidavits, and answer and affidavits.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, Advisory Master.
This is a contest over a part of a sum of money, which, at the time of the filing of the bill, December, 1906, was in the shape of a promissory note or notes given by the defendant Seeber to the defendant Schauble, and which notes were, I believe, in the hands of the defendant David.
At the filing of the bill an order to show cause, with interim■ restraint, was made thereon returnable in January, 1907. Later, on the 15th of Januar3r, by consent of all parties, the notes in question were paid under order of the court, and enough of the proceeds to cover complainants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Holmes v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Canty v. LatternerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Chester v. . JumelNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Kusterer v. City of Beaver DamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. PoliakoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. NiebuhrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
- Grimm v. FranklinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.