Legal Opinion
Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 21, 1958No. Civ. A. 659-57PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
By its opinion filed in this case on February 26, 1958, this Court construed the written contract between the parties, dated May 27, 1955, as entitling the plaintiff, an attorney at law of the District of Columbia, to additional compensation for professional services to the defendant. Because, however, of the relationship of attorney and client between the parties and defendant’s plea that the contingent provisions of the contract were unreasonable and enforceable only to the extent of securing to the plaintiff reasonable compensation, this Court accorded to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Hughes v. EisnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Interchemical Corp. v. Uncas Printing & Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Soper v. BilderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
- Hughes v. EisnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cohen v. Radio-Electronics OfficersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Thomas Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959