Butler v. Sup. Ct. of Los Angeles Cty.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*66Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
Defendant, Wayne Keith Butler, had filed a mandate petition challenging the correctness of the respondent court’s determination that he was ineligible for deferred entry of judgment within the meaning of Penal Code1 section 1000 et seq. because there were allegations he was a recidivist. We conclude the. express language of section 1000, subdivision (b) permits appellate review of a determination an accused drug offender is not eligible for deferred entry of judgment only on direct appeal after a conviction. We therefore deny the petition and vacate the stay…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. AndreottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. TraskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Butler v. Sup. Ct. of Los Angeles Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998