Legal Opinion
People v. Trask
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2010No. C064804PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.
This case presents the question of whether a criminal defendant granted deferred entry of judgment under Penal Code section 1000 et seq.,1 may be terminated from such diversion based solely on her inability to pay the fees of the program to which she has been referred. The answer is no. We shall reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Anita Marie Trask was charged with possession of methamphetamine in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a), *392and false impersonation of another in violation of section…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. CottleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. ORIHUELACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Butler v. Sup. Ct. of Los Angeles Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. POPULARCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. BradenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023
- People v. OrozcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012