Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Knoxville Power & Light Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 25, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The/’ complainants, Anderson and wife, own, property abutting on the defendant’s right of v7ay, known as the “loop” near Knoxville. They also own the property inside the “loop” and the ultimate fee in the right of way. In May or June, 1930, the defendant, which had previously been operating ordinary street cars around said loop, changed to “trackless trolley,” which necessitated the taking up of the original track and the laying of a concrete slab around said loop.

The defendant originally acquired the “loop” right of way under a deed of January 28, 1913, from J. R. Ford and wife, which…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Warren v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Dixon v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  5. Utah Light and Traction Co. v. State Tax Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API