Legal Opinion

Warren v. Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 1948No. [No. 108, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.

This is a stockholders’ suit to enjoin The Baltimore Transit Company from abandoning almost 50 per cent of its track mileage and substituting for trolley cars motor buses, to be owned by a wholly owned subsidiary, The Baltimore Coach Company, “without having first obtained the authority or approval” of its stockholders. Plaintiffs own 1275 shares of common stock (out of 169,142.61 outstanding) and 100 shares (out of 233,-427.2325) of preferred stock. The bill prays that the company be enjoined from (a) “pursuing the aforesaid illegal and fraudulent plans of ‘conversion,’ whereby the property…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dean v. PinderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Prince George's Country Club, Inc. v. Edward R. Carr, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Oliveira v. SugarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Ace Development Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API