Shore v. Coronet Insurance Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA
Plaintiff initiated this action against defendant to compel it, under the terms of a certain insurance policy, to submit a dispute to arbitration. Defendant filed an answer in which it denied that plaintiff was any longer its insured. Thereafter, defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings. After hearing argument, the trial court entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant, and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint. This appeal follows. For its disposition, we are called upon to interpret the Illinois statute covering notice requirements for the renewal of an automobile liability…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowes v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Ambassador East, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by8 opinions
- Waynesville Security Bank v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Yovish v. United Services Automobile Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Goetz v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Slaughter v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Shiaras v. ChuppAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.