Legal Opinion

Waynesville Security Bank v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1973No. 9329PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

Plaintiff Waynesville Security Bank, mortgagee of a “mobile home” owned by one Roy Randolph, brought this action for breach of contract as loss payee in a fire insurance policy issued by defendant Stuyvesant Insurance Company. The loss occurred after the policy had expired; the breach of contract alleged was failure to give the loss payee notice of the expiration of the policy and an opportunity to renew it. The cause was tried to the court on stipulated facts. The court found for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals. Our duty is to determine whether the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Jewel Tea Co. v. City of CarthageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Security Fire & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Western Fire Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Kapahua v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply, a Utah Corporation, and Cna Insurance Company v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Citta v. Camden Fire Insurance Assoc., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MundorfSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Crewse v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. In Re Chateaugay Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API