Legal Opinion

People v. Nangaparbet

New York County Courts

Decided November 9, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam J. Regak, J.

Defendant, accused by a single count indictment of the unlawful possession of a hypodermic syringe and hypodermic needle, moves to dismiss the indictment at the conclusion of the People’s case. The ground advanced in support of the motion presents a clear and focused attack upon the constitutionality of subdivision 3 of section 1747-d of the Penal Law.

Originally derived from the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1932 (see Uniform Laws Annotated, vol. 9B, p. 274), subdivision 3 of section 1747-d of the Penal Law (added by L.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. People Ex Rel. Battista v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. People v. . PersceNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. People v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. People v. BohnkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. StoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. GazulisCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
  3. D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. State v. StepniewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. StepniewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API