Legal Opinion
People v. Bohnke
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1941PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants were convicted of a violation of an ordinance of the village of Southampton, which ordinance makes any person guilty of disorderly conduct who, “ without the consent of the occupant of said premises previously given,” enters upon private residential property in the village for certain purposes, including “ the purpose of distributing any handbill, pamphlet, tract, notice or advertising matter.” The ordinance states that it is riot to be construed, to apply “ to any person who has been a bona fide resident of the Village of Southampton, New York, for a period of at least six (6)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cox v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Brown-Forman Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People v. KucNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
3Cited by25 opinions
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- People v. ShephardIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Hall v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.