D.P. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentGreen, Judge
Respectfully, I believe that sections 21-30.01(e)(2) and (3) of the Dade County Graffiti Ordinance are facially unconstitutional in that they are violative of the due process clause of both the state and federal constitutions.
I
Section 21-30.01(e)(2) of the graffiti ordinance criminalizes a minor’s mere possession of spray paint and broad-tipped markers on public property, highways, and streets, except when in the company of a supervising adult. Metropolitan Dade County, Code § 21-30.01(e)(2) (1994). Section 21-30.01(e)(3) of the ordinance criminalizes a minor’s mere possession of spray paint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowers v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.