Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Battista v. Christian

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1928PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Bbien, J.

The Constitution of this State, by article 1, section 6, provides: “No person shall bo held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime * * * unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury.” Relator was charged with burglary which is an infamous crime. He was held to answer for it, but not on any presentment or indictment of a grand jury. While awaiting action by that body, he petitioned the court for a direction that an information be filed against him and his petition was granted. Then he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to confinement in the reformatory at Elmira. This…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. AhmedNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API