Legal Opinion
Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 23, 1933No. 8867PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
“When personal property is sold and delivered with the condition affixed to the sale that the title is to remain in the vendor until the payment of the purchase-price, such' reservation of title is invalid as to third parties, unless the contract embracing the same is reduced to writing, duly attested, and recorded as prescribed by law.” Penland v. Cathey, 110 Ga. 431 (35 S. E. 659); Farmers Bank of Doerun v. Avery, 145 Ga. 449 (89 S. E. 409); Civil Code (1910), §§ 3318, 3319. Where property sold under such a contract is delivered to the vendee without complying with all the above-mentioned…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rowe v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Turnbull v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Armitage-Herschell Co. v. Muscogee Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Motor Investment Co. v. BreslauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Hubbard v. Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morris Plan Bank v. GinnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Mize v. PaschalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Lewis v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- C. I. T. Corp. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Home Finance Co. v. United Motor SalesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.