Legal Opinion

Home Finance Co. v. United Motor Sales

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1956No. 36029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. On the first trial of this case, the claimant admitted a prima facie case. This admission admitted that the plaintiff in fi. fa. was a bona fide purchaser of the conditional-sale contract, and necessarily admitted its proper execution and recordation in Richmond County, Georgia; otherwise the plaintiff in fi. fa. could not have had a prima, facie case. On the second trial, the plaintiff in fi. fa. assumed the burden of proof and the admissions by the claimant on the previous trial were not binding. Georgia Power Co. v. Moody, 58 Ga. App. 252 (198 S. E. 342).

2. The trial court sustained the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunningham & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Bank of Ringgold v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Stewart v. MundySupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Burgsteiner v. Street-Overland Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Home Finance Co. v. United Motor SalesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API