Legal Opinion
Mize v. Paschal
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 16, 1949No. 16873PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Candler,, Justice.
1. “Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Code, § 110-104. In other words, there is no error in directing a verdict which is the inevitable and only legal result of the pleadings and the evidence. Hooks v. Frick & Co., 75 Ga. 715; City of Abbeville v. Jay, 205 Ga. 743 (55 S. E. 2d, 129), and cases cited.
2. Where personal property is sold and delivered with the condition affixed to the sale…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armitage-Herschell Co. v. Muscogee Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- City of Abbeville v. JaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Penland v. CatheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Farmers Bank v. Avery & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Hooks v. Frick & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cooley v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Douglas Motor Sales, Inc. v. Romy Hammes Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Home Finance Co. v. United Motor SalesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Jewelers Investment Co. v. Elliott Addressing Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Alexander v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.