Legal Opinion
Matter of Personal Restraint of Locklear
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1992No. 57701-3PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
The Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (ISRB or Board) revoked petitioner James Locklear's parole and set a new minimum term of 36 months. This new minimum term exceeds the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA) standard range for Locklear's crimes of conviction. RCW 9.94A. Because the ISRB failed to provide sufficient written reasons to support the length of this new minimum term, we vacate the petitioner's new minimum term and remand to the Board for redetermination in light of this opinion.
I
In 1980 Locklear was convicted of first degree burglary and second degree assault, both of which were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PryorWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Personal Restraint of MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mota v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Personal Restraint of HaynesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- In Re EcklundWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Personal Restraint of DyerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.