Legal Opinion

Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and Paroles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1986No. 52748-2PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodloe, J.

We accepted certified review of consolidated habeas corpus petitions alleging the original RCW 9.95.009 has (1) an ex post facto infirmity due to its abolition of the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles in 1988 and (2) statutory construction problems and equal protection problems resulting from interpretations in two Court of Appeals opinions. Recently enacted legislation corrects the ex post facto concern and clarifies the statute's intent remedying the equal protection concerns.

On August 2, 1984, appellant Lincoln Lane Addleman filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in Walla Walla County…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Haddenham v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re the Personal Restraint of MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. RoggenkampWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API