Legal Opinion

Mota v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1990No. 56284-9, 56347-1PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

— These two cases were consolidated for purposes of the appeal and are decided together. Julio Mota and Robert Baker contend they are entitled to "good-time" credit under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, RCW 9.94A.150, for time spent in county jail prior to sentencing. The State has appealed from decisions in favor of Mota and Baker.

We hold that the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution requires that indigent prisoners who cannot make bail prior to trial and sentencing are entitled to receive good-time credit for the period spent in county…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API