Legal Opinion
Frazzini v. Cable
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1931No. Docket No. 4287PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE Pro Tem. BURROUGHS Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This action was brought by the plaintiff Damiano Frazzini against Louise Cable and C. F. Cable to recover damages for the death of his minor son, Renardo Frazzini, through the alleged negligence of the Cables. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed and judgment thereon entered in favor of the plaintiff and against defendant Louise Cable in the sum of $10,500. From the judgment said defendant Louise Cable appeals.
The judgment is silent concerning the defendant C. F.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Helling v. LewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Backus v. SessionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sullivan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Criss v. Angelus Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Adkison v. AdkisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.