Legal Opinion

MacLeod v. Fox West Coast Theatres Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1937No. L. A. 16239PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The facts that are decisive of the instant case in substance appear to be that the defendant Fox West Coast Theatres had agreed with Charles Chaplin Film Corporation to the effect that for the purpose of testing the ‘ ‘ sound track” and of correcting any slight imperfections which might be detected in a “film” which theretofore had been produced by the latter, it would be “run through” at a theatre that was owned and operated by the former. By Fox West Coast Theatres it was deemed advisable, and was so stated by it to Charles Chaplin Film Corporation, that the persons who would be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walker v. ChanslorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hillock v. Traders InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Townsend v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Brown v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
  5. Burnham v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Martin Marietta Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Wilson v. Loew's Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API