Legal Opinion

Segura v. McBride

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1992No. A054434PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

This appeal raises first impression questions concerning the class of persons regulated pursuant to Civil Code 1 section 1695 et seq. (hereafter the Home Equity Sales Contract Act, or Act), as well as the measure of damages available thereunder. We hold that except for certain persons specifically exempted from regulation, the Act applies to all persons who purchase a residence subject to an outstanding notice of default, regardless of whether the purchaser routinely engages in such transactions, and regardless of whether the distressed buyer initiates the negotiations.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dixon Mobile Homes, Inc. v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. North Oakland Medical Clinic v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Newby v. VromanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  4. Capon v. Monopoly Game LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Jones v. WagnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API