Legal Opinion
Newby v. Vroman
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1992No. A053738PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, J. *
Trueman Vroman appeals from an adverse civil judgment, claiming the trial court improperly awarded prejudgment interest to respondents Elmer and Vincent Newby. We disagree and affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This is the second time we have dealt with this case on appeal, so only a short statement of facts is necessary.
In August 1981, a construction crane owned by respondents was damaged in an accident. NCI, Incorporated, a contracting firm, was hired to repair the damages. NCI, in turn, hired appellant, a civil engineer, to determine what work was necessary to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Sanders v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- North Oakland Medical Clinic v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Deocampo v. AhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Smith v. Young (In Re Young)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.