Ingram v. City of Saginaw
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.
Magical numbers and mystical formulas which can mean the difference between recovery or sudden death of a plaintiff’s cause of action have long plagued both the courts and attorneys of this State and nation.
No better example of precise legal standards in derogation of the judicial fact-finding process based on reasonableness can be found than Michigan’s so-called “2-inch rule” which we find before us once again on its frequent examination by the process of appeal.
A long line of cases waiting to be dredged up by plaintiffs’ attorneys as setting apart their case from the hard and fast decisions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weisse v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Jackson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Harris v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Bigelow v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Berry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zielinski v. SzokolaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Pappas v. City of Bay CityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Insurance Co. of North America v. IroffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Ingram v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Ingram v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.