Legal Opinion

Berry v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1955No. Docket 27, Calendar 46,118PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Hazel M. Berry, plaintiff, resided on the north side of Seward avenue in Detroit, not far from Hamilton avenue to which she walked each morning to board a bus in order to go to work. On the north sidewalk of the street near her home a small section of the walk, to the east and leading to Hamilton avenue, was in a state of disrepair. It had been in that condition for at least as long as plaintiff had lived there, which was about 8 years prior to the accident. Plaintiff knew the condition and took precautions to avoid injury by always walking on the northerly part where for a width of 11 inches…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. Weisse v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Jackson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Northrup v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hopson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Napier v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Harris v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Glancy v. City of RosevilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Pappas v. City of Bay CityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Ingram v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API