Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. City of Kalamazoo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1893PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover for an injury received by reason of an alleged defective cross-walk.

Portage street was unpaved, and in wet weather very muddy. A street-car track occupied the center of the street. The walk was constructed of two planks, four inches thick, and from twelve to sixteen inches in width. Between the planking a space of sixteen inches, and a space outside of the plank, had been paved with cobblestones. The rail in use by the street railway was the ordinary flat rail. The planking had been raised above the street grade, so that at the car tracks the surface of the plank…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Brunswick v. GlogauerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Weisse v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Goodwyn v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Johnson v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. City of Roanoke v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API