State v. Ritz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
A jury convicted defendant of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, and driving while suspended, ORS 811.182. The issue on appeal is whether police violated defendant’s constitutional rights when they forcibly entered his home, without a warrant, in order to apprehend defendant and obtain evidence of his blood alcohol level. The trial court ruled that the warrant-less entry was permissible under the circumstances, which included defendant’s evasion of police before returning to his residence. We affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. At approximately 10:15 p.m.,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RitzOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. GeretyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. RitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Amended September 14, 2015 State of Iowa v. Jesse Michael GaskinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.