Legal Opinion

State v. Ritz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2017No. CC 11CR1068; CA A152111; SC S063292PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, S. J. pro tempore

The parties in this case raise the issue of whether the natural dissipation of alcohol in a suspect’s body creates such an emergency that police officers may enter a suspect’s home without a warrant in order to secure the suspect’s blood-alcohol evidence. Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and generally treat warrantless searches as per se unreasonable. The warrant requirement, however, is subject to exceptions. One exception is for exigent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. PortulanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API