Holt v. Spicer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an order of the district court of Mayes county, overruling his motion to vacate a judgment of said court in favor of the defendant below because of irregularity in obtaining said judgment. Pending this appeal, plaintiff appealed from an order of said district court overruling his motion for a new trial of said cause. This proceeding in error, No. 7710 in this court, was determined adversely to the plaintiff; the judgment of the trial court being affirmed. Holt v. Spicer, 65 Okla. 17, 162 Pac. 686. In this case, this court held…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holt v. SpicerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ames v. BrinsdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. FrensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- In Re Estate of BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Turner v. DexterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Crosbie v. AbsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.