Legal Opinion
Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Holt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 3, 1933No. 20874PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
The record shows that on April 26, 1927, E. B. Holt, a minor, by Osie Holt, his mother and next friend, as plaintiff, commenced an action against the Oklahoma Railway Company and Geo. A. Hensihaw and O. T. Lackey, receivers of the Oklahoma Railway Company, defendants, to recover damages in the sttm of $1,000 for personal injuries 'which it is- alleged that E. B. Holt, a minor aged 19, sustained on April 22, 1927, as a result of a collision between an automobile which he was driving near Harrison avenue in Oklahoma City, on Fifth- street, and a street car which was at said time being operated…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gavin v. HeathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Leforce v. HaymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Provins v. LoviSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- First State Bank of Indiahoma v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Myers v. ChamnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carlin v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Welborn v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Federal Tax Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Fowler v. GoldfederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Turner v. DexterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.