Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Borough of Naugatuck
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 16, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The questions propounded in this reservation arise from the following stipulated facts: The plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as RFC, is a corporation created by an act of Congress (47 Stat. 5; 15 U. S. C. § 601) as an instrumentality of the government of the United States with such powers only as are given it by Congress. All of its stock is owned by the United States and it has no entity separate and apart from that of the government of the United States. On October 1, 1946, and October 1, 1947, it was the record owner of real estate and the machinery attached thereto located in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hermance v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- People Ex Rel. Chamberlain v. ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Bridgeport Brass Co. v. DrewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Kuhlemeier v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by11 opinions
- National CSS, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Empire Estates, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Matzul v. Town of MontvilleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Albert Brothers, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Chapman v. Town of EllingtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.