Legal Opinion

Bridgeport Brass Co. v. Drew

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 25, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

Questions one and three ask whether the action of the tax commissioner was authorized by § 1255 of the General Statutes, providing that “any clerical omission or mistake in the assessment of taxes may be at any time corrected according to the fact by the assessors or board of relief, and the tax shall be levied and collected according to such corrected assessment.” The charter of the city of Bridgeport (Special Laws of 1917, p. 839) provides for the abolishment of the board of assessors and the substitution in its place of a tax commissioner, who “shall have all the powers and duties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. State v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
  4. Turney v. Town of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  5. Atwater v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Sibley v. Town of MiddlefieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. National CSS, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Burritt Mutual Savings Bank v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API