Legal Opinion

State v. Middleton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 26, 1976No. 20176PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, Justice:

Frank Middleton appeals from his conviction of rape and armed robbery. He contends that he should be granted a new trial because of alleged trial errors. We disagree and affirm his conviction.

The following five questions are raised for our consideration :

1. Did the trial judge err in refusing to ask jurors during their voir dire examination five questions submitted by Middleton relating to whether they would presume that Middleton was innocent when so instructed by the trial judge?

2. Did the trial judge err in refusing to ask jurors during their voir dire examination three…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SmartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. PressleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API