Ham v. South Carolina
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Petitioner was convicted in the South Carolina trial court of the possession of marihuana in violation of state law.1 He was sentenced to 18 months’ confinement, and on appeal his conviction was affirmed by a divided *525South Carolina Supreme Court. 256 S. C. 1, 180 S. E. 2d 628 (1971). We granted certiorari limited to the question of whether the trial judge’s refusal to examine jurors on voir dire as to possible prejudice against petitioner violated the latter’s federal constitutional rights. 404 U. S. 1057 (1972).
Petitioner is a young, bearded Negro who has lived most of his life in Florence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Groppi v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by593 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
588 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.