Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 4, 1981No. 21387PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Willie Bailey appeals his conviction for assault and battery with intent to kill, breaking and entering a railroad car and grand larceny. We affirm.

Appellant contends first that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on the legal presumption which arises when one is found in possession of recently stolen goods. Appellant does not seriously contend that the law was not stated correctly since the trial judge did emphasize the merely evidentiary nature of the rebuttable presumption arising in that situation. State v. Smalls, 272 S. C. 279, 251 S. E. (2d) 734 (1979); State…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. State v. NeeleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. DupreeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. CutroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API