Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Thomas C. Thompson Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 17, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-K-731PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

This case involves a strict liability tort claim for injuries sustained from the use of enamel paints manufactured and sold by the Thomas C. Thomson Company (“TCT”) and the Thompson Enamel division of the Ceramic Coating Company (“CCC”). The case raises two questions of first impression under Colorado law: First, does Colorado recognize the emerging tort based product line exception to the general corporations and contract rule of nonliability of a purchaser of assets of a corporation. Second, do Colorado conflict of law provisions provide for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fish v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Richard O'Brien Companies v. Challenge-Cook Bros.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987
  3. McKinnon v. FH Morgan & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Wilkerson v. CO Porter MacHinery Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Young v. Fulton Iron Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API