Legal Opinion

Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

We are saved the trouble of searching the record for the purpose of determining whether or not defendant was guilty of negligence. Defendant concedes that there is sufficient evidence of its negligence to take the case to the jury.

Defendant insists, however, that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. This argument is based upon the contention that plaintiff parked his truck on the main-traveled portion of the highway. One who parks a motor vehicle on the main-traveled portion of the highway without necessity therefor is guilty of negligence: Townsend v. Jaloff,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ramp v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Brown v. O.-W. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Miami Quarry Co. v. Seaborg Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Townsend v. JaloffOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. CypherIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Geisen v. LuceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Leveillee v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API