Legal Opinion

Orien v. Lutz

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 3, 2017No. B277323PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*738FLIER, J.

*959Defendants Mista L. Lutz and Russell A. Howells appeal from an order granting attorney fees to plaintiff Stara Orien, respondent here, after the trial court entered an interlocutory judgment of partition in her favor. The trial court found that an attorney fee provision in an earlier settlement agreement among the parties applied to the partition action, and thus awarded all fees to plaintiff under Civil Code section 1717 rather than apportioning the costs of partition under Code of Civil Procedure section 874.040. We hold that the partition action did not fall within the terms of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Gil v. MansanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. (PS) DeMartini v. DeMartiniDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Land Value Holdings, LLC v. Miller CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Murray v. Hull CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Handwerk CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Solis v. Clean Harbors, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API