(PS) DeMartini v. DeMartini
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY P. DEMARTINI, et al., No. 2:14-cv-02722-DJC-CKD 12 Plaintiffs, v. 13 ORDER MICHAEL J. DEMARTINI, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Timothy DeMartini and Margie DeMartini’s Motion 18 for Allocation of Statutory Partition Costs. Plaintiffs argue they have incurred 19 attorney’s fees and costs while litigating this partition action for work that benefits all 20 Parties in common. Plaintiffs argue that, under California law, these fees and costs 21 must be apportioned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Daryn PurvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.