Solis v. Clean Harbors, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ABRAHAM SOLIS, Case No. 20-cv-02660-AGT 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 10 CLEAN HARBORS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants. 11 12 13 Defendants Aerotek, Inc. and Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. (“Clean Harbors”), as 14 the prevailing parties in this negligence action, move for an award of $75,000 in attorneys’ fees 15 from plaintiff Abraham Solis. Dkt. 55, Mot. Solis opposes, arguing that the contractual attorneys’ 16 fees provision defendants rely on is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Ingram v. OroudjianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.