Legal Opinion

Solis v. Clean Harbors, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 31, 2022No. 3:20-cv-02660Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ABRAHAM SOLIS, Case No. 20-cv-02660-AGT 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 10 CLEAN HARBORS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants. 11 12 13 Defendants Aerotek, Inc. and Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. (“Clean Harbors”), as 14 the prevailing parties in this negligence action, move for an award of $75,000 in attorneys’ fees 15 from plaintiff Abraham Solis. Dkt. 55, Mot. Solis opposes, arguing that the contractual attorneys’ 16 fees provision defendants rely on is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ingram v. OroudjianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API