Legal Opinion
Steinam v. Bell
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided February 28, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from second district court. Action by Edward S. Steinam against George H. Bell to recover damages for false representations. From a judgment dismissing the complaint rendered on a trial before a justice without a jury, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegebich, J.
The plaintiff, in his verified complaint, alleged:
“(1) That the oefendant, offering to sell the plaintiff a certain mare, warranted and falsely and wrongfully represented said mare to be sound, free from fault, and correct in every respect; (2) that the plaintiff, relying upon such warranty and representations, and induced thereby, then and there purchased said mare, and paid the defendant therefor the sum of §250; (3) that at the time of said warranty and sale the said mare was unsound, unkind, and untrue, as well as restive and ungovernable in harness, and had an equine disease, and was,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Arthur v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Ross v. . MatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Bennett v. . Leeds Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Moore v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nicoll v. ClarkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Lambert v. HoffmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
- Milch v. Westchester Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Pennsylvania & Delaware Oil Co. v. SpitelnikAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Falk v. KareskiNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895