Lambert v. Hoffman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the justice of the Eirst District Court in favor of defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.
The plaintiffs sne upon a judgment of the District Court for the city of Elizabeth, New Jersey, in their favor against defendant, for $38.60, entered September 28, 1896. The defense to the action was by answer, containing, among other averments, first, a statement that the defendant “ has no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations contained in the first and second paragraphs in the complaint; ” and second, an allegation that the District Court for the city of Elizabeth had no jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the action.
The questions presented upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dunstan v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Steinam v. BellNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alexander v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. JacksonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Pennsylvania & Delaware Oil Co. v. SpitelnikAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Sanchez & Haya Co. v. HirschAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Thornton v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.