Legal Opinion

deNEERGAARD v. Dillingham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 3, 1963No. 1922PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The plaintiffs claim that three particular springs are enclosed by the boundaries of a certain parcel of land to which they have title. The most northerly of these springs was connected to the domestic water supply of the plaintiffs when they acquired the property in 1950. The plaintiffs’ chain of title ultimately goes back to the conveyance of this same parcel by the defendant and her husband, then living, to one Clarence Smith. The land adjoining to the south and west is still owned by the defendant. She says that the parcel in question does not include any of these springs because they are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  2. Davidson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
  3. Latchis v. JohnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  4. Bresette v. KnappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. Aiken v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Crawford v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  3. Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. Potwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  5. Bourne v. LajoieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API