Legal Opinion
Potwin v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 6, 1967No. 1252PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.
The Tuckers changed their minds about selling their home place to the Potwins. As a result, the Potwins obtained a decree of specific performance from the court of chancery, requiring the conveyance of the property to them at the agreed price. Since the Tuckers had, in the interim, conveyed the premises to Paul A. Bourdon, Esquire, he, too, was joined as a party defendant. The defendants bring this appeal.
The matter began on the day when the plaintiffs, the Potwins, and the defendant Tuckers exchanged written acknowledgments of an agreement on the terms of sale of the property, accompanied by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of St. Johnsbury v. LaperleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Little v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- deNEERGAARD v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Petition of New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Neverett v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- George v. Oakhurst Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- In Re FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Lakeview Farm, Inc. v. EnmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Montgomery v. BranonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- Towsley v. Champlain Oil CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.