Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Clark

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 5, 1952No. 1813PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCleary, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment brought under V. S. 47, Ch. 77. Heard by the County Court with Findings of Fact and Judgment Order.

The Findings of Fact show that on March 30, 1939, Virginia M. Aiken conveyed certain land and premises to C. O. Granai but reserved to herself “all rights, title, benefits and interests in said property during her natural lifetime.” On the same day, Granai quit claimed the same land and premises to Virginia M. Aiken, Erwin Aiken and Muriel Clark. Both deeds were duly recorded in the Land Records of the towns of Barre and Marshfield where the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kennedy, Admr. v. Rutter, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. In Re Robinson's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Latchis v. JohnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kipp v. Chips EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Mann v. LevinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Creed v. ClogstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. deNEERGAARD v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  5. Welch v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API