Legal Opinion

Howard v. SULZER ORTHOPEDICS, INC.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 2011No. Case 02-CV-0564-CVE-FHMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CLAIRE V. EAGAN, Chief Judge.

Now before the Court are Centerpulse Orthopedics Inc.’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs [sic] 2 Negligence Per Se Claim (Dkt. # 136) and Plaintiffs’ Response and Objection to Sulzer’s “Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s [sic] Negligence Per Se Claim” and Plaintiffs’ Counter-Motion for Partial Judgment on Liability (Dkt. # 139). Defendants filed Center- pulse Orthopedics Inc.’s Reply in Support of its Renewed Motion for Summary [Judgment] and Opposition to Plaintiffs [sic] Counter-Motion for Partial Judgment on…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  2. Doe v. Sunflower Farmers Markets, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
  3. Littlebear v. Advanced Bionics, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API